|
Interview with the CEO
To view
a sample question and answer interview conducted
with Zafar Khan, CEO of RPost, browse the questions
below and select the questions that you would like
to ask. You may use the text from this section in
whole or in part for articles, editorials, technical
reviews, blogs or in other publication materials.
If you
would like other questions answered or other types
of quotes, please contact RPost at
info@rpost.com
SAMPLE TITLE: Protected
or Exposed: Registered E-mailŪ = Legal Proof™
Editor: What is
Registered E-mail?
Khan:
The Registered
E-mailŪ service is simple to use and is designed to
protect the sender in those instances where the
sending, content or time of an e-mail are disputed,
in addition to enhancing efficiency and
cost-savings. Think of it as legal proof for
important e-mail transactions -- proof that can save
you time, money, and headaches!
Editor: Why is the
Registered E-mailŪ service important in today’s
business climate?
Khan:
The simple fact that
almost everyone has access to some sort of
electronic mail capability causes us to take a lot
for granted. While e-mail users are becoming more
aware of the electronic record they have created, it
is important to consider these electronic records
can serve as a critically important defense for
business transactions, if properly managed.
In
the case of a dispute over content, timing, sending
or receiving of an e-mail, the archiving of that
e-mail in electronic or printed form provides very
little protection after the fact. With two clicks of
the mouse, one could change anything in standard
e-mail and represent it to be the original e-mail.
Therefore, it is important to consider that the
recipient of an important e-mail transaction could
alter the original e-mail and then subsequently
challenge the sender’s archived copy as being
fraudulent. Also, the fact that something appears in
a “sent” folder does not mean that it was ever sent
– one can drag anything into that folder.
Editor: Is it really
that easy to alter an e-mail record?
Khan:
In most cases, the
recipient of standard e-mail messages can easily
change the text, the “from” address, the content of
the attachments, the “time sent” and also move it to
any folder to suit his or her needs in perpetrating
a hoax. Plus, the recipient’s computer can be set to
read any time other than the actual time.
Just
when you need your e-mail record to stand up to
scrutiny, your opposition could simply claim that:
“they did not receive your e-mail”-- (the critical
e-mail you represented as sent and received) or
“that is not what your e-mail said” when they
received it. Or worse, someone could deliberately
manipulate your e-mail, print it out, and represent
it as the truth. With standard e-mail records and
archives, you are exposed to such challenges without
the necessary defense.
Editor: How does the
Registered E-mailŪ service work, in basic terms?
Khan:
Just as a signature
confirms delivery of FedExŪ, a digitally recorded
server-to-server dialogue of message acceptance is
folded into a Registered Receipt™ e-mail and
returned to the sender to confirm delivery and
content of the sent Registered E-mailŪ message. The
unique attributes of the RPostŪ service is the
ability to capture the server-to-server dialogue (in
practice, servers often do not communicate in full
compliance with the standard languages) for the
sender, associate that dialogue with the precise
content and times of transmission, and interpret the
dialogue for the non-technical person.
RPost’s Registered
E-mailŪ system, in capturing the server-to-server
dialogue, uses proprietary algorithms to interpret
those dialogues for the layperson to understand, and
uses cryptography to associate the precise content
of the transmission with those dialogues and precise
times of sending and receiving. This is packaged in
the form of a Registered Receipt™ e-mail, which is
retuned to the sender as a durable, verifiable,
self-contained record of the entire e-mail
transaction. This Registered Receipt™ record can
also be used as a verification tool to re-construct
the original e-mail content and attachments as
needed by the sender as neither RPostŪ nor any other
party store a copy of the e-mail, receipt, or
transmission information. The Registered Receipt™
e-mail is the sole official record of the Registered
E-mailŪ transaction. (Note: neither hard-copy
letters nor FedExŪ, etc. can provide proof of the
content transmitted and in this instance; RPostŪ
provides an even higher level of protection.)
Editor: How does this
fit within the area of "compliance"?
Khan:
Registered E-mailŪ
services allow the sender to prove that they have
complied with the byelaw, contractual, or regulated
notification provision. While using USPS first class
mail, the presumption of “delivery” is evidenced
where you have a record of sending; however, under
the Uniform Electronic Transaction Act, e-mail
"delivery" is evidenced when the recipient's agent,
their mail server, has accepted the entire data
transmission. Therefore, under electronic statutes,
the burden is on the sender to prove "receipt" of
the e-mail, which is one of the key features of the
RPostŪ system.
Further, provisions of electronic law and recent
court decisions underscore the fact that e-business
systems require proper transaction documentation.
Often there is a requirement for a reliable
recordkeeping management system that can record,
retrieve and authenticate electronic messages
involving important business communications and
transactions (both content of e-mail and
attachments, and official time sent and received).
The RPostŪ Registered Receipt™ e-mail is a simple,
elegant solution to record retention and proof of
notice compliance requirements.
Editor: Would
Registered E-mailŪ messages stand up in court?
Khan:
Registered E-mailŪ
messages hold far greater evidential weight than
traditional mail, courier, fax, or e-mail, and
therefore, should provide the sender with protection
that will stand up to scrutiny in a dispute
resolution situation. Registered E-mailŪ would
provide the sender the upper hand in any legal
discovery disputes.
From
the perspective of a mediator, arbitrator, or
judicial officer, one looks first at the evidentiary
value of what is submitted in gauging its
trustworthiness. Evidential weight is about reducing
uncertainty surrounding the evidence. The party with
the greater evidential weight will win in most
cases, or at least mitigate its liability.
Editor: Will Registered
E-mailŪ services integrate seamlessly with other
components (archive, records management, document
management, etc.) of an overall compliance solution
and strategy?
Khan:
“Yes.” The Registered
E-mailŪ service seamlessly plugs into virtually any
e-mail archive or compliance solution. As a rule of
thumb, if your system manages e-mail records, you
can easily add Registered E-mailŪ services to it.
Editor: Creating a
compliance strategy requires enterprises to develop
processes for effective e-mail management. How do
Registered E-mailŪ services enhance a company’s
capability to classify, store, and manage the
enormous volume of electronic communications?
Khan:
Having spoken to the
simplicity of the Registered Receipt™ e-mail for
recording purposes, from a sender’s perspective or
an organizational perspective, if an electronic
message was deemed important enough to have been
sent via “Registered E-mailŪ” than someone, through
automated policies or ad-hoc, has classified that
e-mail as important enough to then be recorded and
archived. Therefore, a first level of classification
would be “Registered” = important and archive with
distinct policies. Note: In addition to the benefits
of the Registered Receipt™ e-mail, the Registered
E-mailŪ service also has the inherent capability of
classifying messages with client or customer codes
or other significant identifiers.
Editor: Has the legal
community begun to embrace this technology?
Khan:
Various Bar
associations have endorsed the Registered E-mailŪ
services as legal proof for internet e-mail. These
organizations want to educate attorneys about
effective tools that better their representation of
their clients. For example, The Los Angeles County
Bar has endorsed the Registered E-mailŪ service as a
tool to reduce cost, simplify processes, and bring
the legal community into conformity with modern
business practices.
Further, attorney users range from in-house counsel;
to legal oriented entities such as the United States
Government Accountability Office, an arm of Congress
that audits the Federal government; to attorneys at
global firms such as Greenberg Traurig; to sole
practitioners and small law offices.
Editor: What would you
relay to readers as a basic test of whether they
should be using Registered E-mailŪ services for some
of their messages?
Khan:
The basic test is,
does it matter if the original e-mail message is
misquoted; never received or read; delivered but its
actual receipt denied; insured of content integrity
from reader to reader; or challenged based upon the
actual time sent and received? Do you have or plan
to have a records retention policy or e-mail archive
system in place?
If
your answer is “yes” to any of these questions, then
you should be taking the necessary steps to protect
yourself and your clients’ important e-mail
transactions with Registered E-mailŪ services.
Editor: Can you list
some of the companies that use Registered E-mailŪ
services?
Khan:
RPost has users
across various business lines. For instance, United
States Government Accountability Office (arm of
Congress), United States Department of Commerce
(Census Bureau), Greenberg Traurig LLP (global law
firm), Watson Wyatt (global professional firm);
Macquarie Bank (global financial services company),
and Bombardier (global manufacturer), to name just a
few.
Editor: How often do
your typical users send Registered E-mailŪ messages?
Khan:
Usage patterns are
completely dependant upon the task for which they
are employed. Special notices, announcements,
contract changes, legal filings, reporting
requirements, etc. can occur on an ad hoc basis or
be recurring electronic messages sent routinely to a
wide customer base or to targeted individuals. We
have some users who send only a few Registered
E-mail messages per month, per week, or per day,
while others send a large amount every day.
Editor: Where do you
find Registered E-mailŪ services being used most
often within the private sector ?
Khan:
Business executives
and managers, corporate lawyers, procurement
managers, contracts managers, asset, logistics &
facilities managers, sales and client relationship
managers, automated and policy driven processes,
compliance & risk managers, and supply-chain
managers are the typical functional areas where our
Registered E-mailŪ service generally is employed. We
also see use by human resource professionals for
sensitive, action-oriented, official electronic
notifications to employees within an organization.
Business e-mail usage is an international fact of
life. However, most business e-mail users overlook
the accountability that is sacrificed once e-mail
messages go out to the Internet. RPost’s Registered
E-mailŪ services have a broad application in the
business world, but generally speaking, those people
in a company communicating outside of the company
are the most frequent users of our Registered
E-mailŪ services.
Editor: Are there
certain types of companies that use Registered
E-mailŪ services more than others?
Khan:
As a rule of thumb,
we see wider use in professional services
organizations as compared to operational companies,
but in both categories, we see a broad range of
usage - heavy, medium, and light. RPost’s Registered
E-mailŪ services have been endorsed by leading
professional organizations within the fields of law,
insurance, real estate, travel and by the federal
auditor of all U.S. government departments. Usage is
obviously heavier within these categories, but we
also find a number of niche industries, such as
companies that certify food as organic, companies
that deliver data products, and others coming to
recognize the value and need to protect themselves
with Registered E-mailŪ services.
Editor: Is this a
software purchase or a service?
Khan:
Our service is
offered and structured to avoid most of the
traditional software purchase issues, such as large
up front investments, maintenance fees, etc. Users
have found the simplest way to purchase our service
is through a pay-as-you-go plan. No investment, no
start-up cost, simply pennies per use, with all
costs fully loaded into the price per use.
This
lets users install the service on their desktop and
have it available when they need it – for when they
are composing urgent, critical, or last minute
e-mail.
Opting for this type of a pricing model presents
RPost with challenges it would not have otherwise.
For RPost, if customers do not use our service,
RPost generates no revenue as opposed to a software
purchase that is paid for up front regardless of
use. Therefore, RPost has a very strong incentive to
ensure that its users are completely satisfied and
understand the benefits and the many unique features
of the service; thereby ensuring that we always put
the customer first.
Editor: How do you view
the competitive landscape?
Khan:
Because our service
is recipient agnostic, meaning that the recipient of
a Registered E-mailŪ message does noting to generate
the return of the Registered Receipt™ e-mail to the
sender, we do not have a direct competitor. While
other companies may offer something that may sound
like our Registered E-mailŪ service, what makes them
stand apart from RPost’s Registered E-mailŪ as a
group is the burdensome requirement that the
recipient become an active participant in the
“protected electronic transaction.” For instance,
people can confuse Registered E-mailŪ services with
novelty e-mail tracking or store-and-forward
services – both of which tend to work some of the
time, require special settings or action by the
recipient, store information, tend to be relatively
unreliable with false negatives, and do not return
legally valid evidence of the precise content and
attachments sent and received. On other occasions,
people confuse Registered E-mailŪ services with
“encrypted e-mail” – while Registered E-mailŪ
messages use cryptography in the processing; the
message itself is not encrypted for privacy unless
the sender chooses to do so as an option.
Honestly, our biggest competitor or hurdle is
“apathy” on the part of e-mail users. People
generally are set in their ways of using e-mail and
they love the fact that it is supposedly “free.” We
arrive on the scene and proceed to burst many a
bubble once we explain the risk; exposure and
possible liability of conducting important
electronic business transactions without the legal
protection of a Registered Receipt™ e-mail, should
those transactions become questioned, challenged or
simply misrepresented after the fact.
Where
paper transactions persist, we must work to show how
using Registered E-mailŪ services provide a more
efficient, reliable and cheaper way to conduct
routine business transactions compared to fax,
certified mail, courier, regular mail, and simple
e-mail with a follow-up telephone call. For
management, we can show how Registered E-mailŪ
services provide accountability, oversight and
record retention protections that are not otherwise
present with the old way of conducting business –
and at a much lower operational cost!
Registered E-mailŪ services by RPost remain unique
in the marketplace.
Editor: What is your
overall strategy and goal?
Khan:
Our goal is to put
the Power of Proof™ in the hands of every
businessperson in the world, in small and large
organizations, by bringing accountability, legal
protection and efficiency to their e-mail
communications. We are setting the de-facto global
standard for “Legal Proof” for important e-mail
transactions.
Our
strategy is simple and straightforward. We work with
the most sophisticated industry partners to place
the capability of sending Registered E-mailŪ
messages at the fingertips of every business e-mail
user on the planet, and to effectively educate them
on why, how and when to use the service. We look at
a “sophisticated industry partner” as a professional
organization, large or small, local or global, that
understands how to add the RPost technology to their
offerings and/or educate their members and user base
on how the service can benefit them by enhancing
their specific electronic business transactions.
Editor: How would you
describe the market appetite for Registered E-mailŪ
services?
Khan:
Registered E-mailŪ
services are still relatively new in the
marketplace. An almost universal reaction is…“it
just makes sense!” or “it is about time!” Obviously,
we are still breaking new ground, but once the seed
is planted, the service takes off as users are quick
to see the inherent value.
Human
nature is such that anything that someone can
acquire at a reasonable price, to protect him or
herself within the competitive business world
against the threat or real legal damages, will sell.
Our biggest challenge is to first get before the
right business audiences and then to educate them to
the fact that they need legal protection and
accountability within their electronic business
transactions, which they accomplish easily and
inexpensively by using RPost’s Registered E-mailŪ
services.
Editor: Are you focused
solely on the US market or also the international
market?
Khan:
We began in the U.S.
market, to learn precisely when and why certain
businesses use the Registered E-mailŪ service, but
always with the long-range goal of setting the de
facto international standard for Registered E-mailŪ
messages that could provide Legal Proof™ of
delivery. Having achieved traction in key business
segments, we filed for patents that reach over
thirty countries and we moved our service to select
international markets. Presently, we have a presence
in the USA, Europe, Latin America, Australia, Africa
and offer our Registered E-mailŪ service in English,
Spanish, German, French, Portuguese, and Russian. We
intend to roll out other languages and more
locations shortly.
Editor: Is the RPost
technology patented?
Khan:
Yes. The RPostŪ
software and systems are unique and have over twenty
patents that are pending with two issued, covering
thirty-nine countries.
Editor: What
specifically are the suite of services associated
with the Registered E-mailŪ service?
Khan:
The Registered
E-mailŪ services allow a registered sender to extend
the same protections embodied within the Registered
Receipt™ e-mail to the recipient as well – even
though the recipient has not contracted for the
service. The Registered E-mailŪ message can go
“unmarked” so that the recipient is unaware that the
message has been sent as a Registered E-mailŪ
message, but with the same protections afforded the
sender. For governmental users, the “Official Use”
feature guards against inadvertent Freedom of
Information Act disclosure related problems. The
“Digital Seal™” feature allows the recipient to
verify both the authorship and the content of a
Registered E-mailŪ message, and this feature is
durable in that each subsequent recipient of
forwarded e-mail messages can do the same.
In
short, the Registered E-mailŪ services comprise a
suite of service offerings, from special features to
protect against hoaxes and phishing, to methods of
closing business deals without printing, faxing, and
mailing. For example, the Register Reply™ feature
coupled with standard electronic signature law,
allows any sender to record the back-and-forth
e-mail negotiation or agreement – without requiring
the recipient to do anything or have anything
special other than e-mail. We use this method to
close all of our business agreements worldwide –
with the speed of e-mail, automated electronic
records, and without cost, paper, or faxes.
Editor: How would you
describe RPost in 80 words?
Khan:
RPost, the leader in
managed outbound messaging with its flagship
Registered E-mailŪ services, enable users to send
e-mail with proof of delivery – admissible evidence
of e-mail content and time sent and received.
Advanced services include end-to-end encryption, PDF
conversion, information leak protection,
e-contracting and e-signing, combined into one tool
offered at a flat per e-mail price which is about
the cost of a postage stamp. RPost services have
been tested, accredited and are used daily by the
U.S. federal government.
Editor: How would you
describe RPost in 100 words?
Khan:
RPostŪ
has set the global standard for accountability in
electronic business communications. Its suite of
Registered E-mailŪ services provide the sender of
e-mail with legal and verifiable evidence of the
content and official time any e-mail is sent and
received by anyone, anywhere in the world. RPostŪ
tools permit users in countries around the world to
do more, better, faster and at lower cost; with
simple-to-use functionality. RPost’s patented
services include an integrated set of eContracting,
e-signature, security and privacy/encryption tools
and are used daily by government, enterprise, as
well as small business users.
Editor: How would you
describe RPost in 150 words?
Khan:
RPostŪ has set the
global standard for Legal Proof™ for e-mail with a
suite of managed outbound messaging services. At its
core, RPost's patented Registered E-mailŪ services
provide the sender with legally valid evidence of
precisely what e-mail content and attachments were
sent and received, by whom and when. RPost services
include an integrated set of eContracting,
e-signature, security and privacy/encryption tools.
RPost has strategic business relationships with
leading technology and service providers to provide
RPost services to their existing clients, including:
Pitney Bowes, Postini, Symantec, AT&T, Sprint,
Qwest, Orange (FranceTel) and BTInfonet (BritishTel),
among others.
Available in five languages, RPost Registered
E-mailŪ services are also used daily by the United
States Government and have been endorsed and
marketed by many of the influential bar associations
in the United States. Headquartered in Los Angeles,
RPost has offices in Washington D.C., San Diego and
worldwide.
|